The correct answer that is twice as long as the distractors. The absolute in a wrong answer. The word from the question echoed only in the right one. Every cue here lets somebody score above chance on subject knowledge they do not have, and every one is invisible until you look at the whole bank at once.
Free · No account · Your files never upload
The character count beside each option is there because length is the cue learners exploit most and the one writers introduce without noticing: the correct answer grows because it carries the qualifications you felt obliged to include, and the distractors stay short because they were invented in a hurry.
Looks at every question for the cues that let somebody answer correctly without knowing the subject. The correct answer that is conspicuously longest. All of the above. An absolute in a distractor. A distinctive word from the question echoed only in the right answer. Negative stems with nothing to mark the negative.
Every one of them is invisible one question at a time. The correct answer grows longer because it carries the qualifications you felt obliged to include, and the distractors stay short because they were written in a hurry afterwards. Nobody notices while writing question eleven. It shows up when you line up all forty and look at the lengths, which is what the character count beside each option is for.
That a learner cannot beat the bank by reading strategy alone. It says nothing about whether the questions assess the right things, or assess them at the right level, which is the harder and more important half. Use the Objective Coverage Matrix for the first of those.
It does not judge whether a distractor is plausible, which needs subject knowledge. A wrong answer nobody would ever pick makes a four-option question into a three-option one, and that is a real fault this cannot see.