The ID Toolbox
← All tools

Development Time & Cost Estimator

The number everyone asks for and nobody can produce on the spot. Choose a complexity level and the finished runtime, and get a defensible range of development hours and cost, broken down by project phase.

Free · No account · Your files never upload

Complexity
What else is involved
Low52 hrs$4,420
Likely73 hrs$6,205
High105 hrs$8,925
PhaseShareHoursCost
Analysis & kickoff10%7$595
Design & storyboard20%15$1,275
Development & media45%33$2,805
QA & revisions20%14$1,190
Project management5%4$340
Total100%73$6,205

Phase hours split the likely estimate. Quote the range, not the midpoint, and say out loud what the number excludes: subject-matter expert time, stakeholder review cycles, translation, and the LMS work after handoff.

What this does

Turns a course length and a complexity level into a development estimate, adjusted for the things that actually drive cost: voice-over, video, simulation, branching, accessibility work. It reports a range rather than a single number, and breaks the likely figure down by project phase.

Why a range and not one number

Every published benchmark for e-learning development is a spread, often a wide one, because team experience and content readiness move the figure more than complexity does. A single number invites somebody to hold you to it. Quote the range, name the assumptions, and you have a conversation instead of a commitment.

Where the numbers come from

The hours-per-finished-hour bands are the industry benchmark ranges that have circulated in this field for years, and the phase splits are the conventional ones. Both are reasoned starting points rather than measurements of your team. If you have your own historical data, it beats this every time. Use these bands to sanity check your figures, not to replace them.

What it deliberately excludes

Subject-matter expert time, stakeholder review cycles, translation, and the LMS configuration and testing that happens after handoff. These are commonly where a project actually overruns, and they vary so widely by organization that folding them into a ratio would make the estimate less honest rather than more complete. Name them separately when you present a number.

Related tools